But this is likely to be complicated, as

MaHfUjCr1

This objective remains problematic, however, for three reasons: it lacks ambition, consistency, and it does not reflect the country's real emissions, since the devastating forest fires that have been raging for months have not been taken taken into account in this "contribution". of GHGs – its forest fires having placed it in 4 th position. Its weak commitment risks hampering international efforts to tackle climate change. An unambitious goal The commitment of each country to reduce its emissions is decisive in limiting global warming to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial period ie before 1880.

Compared to that of other countries, will the emission rate set by Indonesia make it possible to achieve this objective? Not really. To really contribute to the global effort, the country will have to stabilize or reduce its emissions, while its economy is booming. According to the latest estimates from the Intergovernmental  phone number list Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ), the ideal would be to detach this economic boom from that of emissions. the Indonesian economy relies on sectors with a high carbon footprint, such as agriculture, forestry and energy. For the moment, the country is looking for a way to decouple the increase in GDP from the increase in emissions, but only in a relative way: GHG emissions will simply have to increase more slowly than GDP.



A 29% reduction in these emissions will also not be sufficient to achieve the overall objective set by the scientists. Given the country's endemic problems, particularly related to fires, Indonesia must be more ambitious. An incoherent project His climate project is not coherent either. There is no coordination between the actions envisaged, the sectors concerned and the planning process, for example between the allocated budget and the reduction plans. This inconsistency is due to the process of developing the INDC.